You cannot claim the RV-7 is universally better than FSX or BTS. Instead, let's list three scenarios.
Is the virtual RV-7 in FSX with BTS mods "better" than flying the real thing? Or is the real RV-7A "better" than any desktop simulation could ever be? We are going to break down every variable: flight dynamics, cost, accessibility, maintenance, and pure visceral thrill. fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
landing gear, favored by purists for traditional handling and aesthetics. : Features a tricycle gear You cannot claim the RV-7 is universally better
So the real question is:
You are the maintenance officer. Unless you pay a mechanic (A&P), you will spend weekends on condition inspections, changing spark plugs, cleaning belly oil, and chasing elusive electrical gremlins. If you built the plane yourself (as most RV owners do), you know every screw. That is a blessing and a curse. A "better" day for a real RV owner is a day where nothing breaks and you actually get to fly. Or is the real RV-7A "better" than any