Intitle Index Of Ms | Office [2021]

Are LLMs following the correct reasoning paths?

Bangzheng Li, Ben Zhou, Fei Wang, Xingyu Fu, Dan Roth, Muhao Chen,

▶ University of California, Davis ▶ University of Pennsylvania   ▶ University of Southern California
arXiv Code Dataset

We propose a novel probing method and benchmark called EUREQA. EUREQA is an entity-searching task where a model finds a missing entity based on described multi-hop relations with other entities. These deliberately designed multi-hop relations create deceptive semantic associations, and models must stick to the correct reasoning path instead of incorrect shortcuts to find the correct answer. Experiments show that existing LLMs cannot follow correct reasoning paths and resist the attempt of greedy shortcuts. Analyses provide further evidence that LLMs rely on semantic biases to solve the task instead of proper reasoning, questioning the validity and generalizability of current LLMs’ high performances.

intitle index of ms office
LLMs make errors when correct surface-level semantic cues-entities are recursively replaced with descriptions, and the errors are likely related to token similarity. GPT-3.5-turbo is used for this example.

intitle index of ms office The EUREQA dataset

Download the dataset from [Dataset]

In EUREQA, every question is constructed through an implicit reasoning chain. The chain is constructed by parsing DBPedia. Each layer comprises three components: an entity, a fact about the entity, and a relation between the entity and its counterpart from the next layer. The layers stack up to create chains with different depths of reasoning. We verbalize reasoning chains into natural sentences and anonymize the entity of each layer to create the question. Questions can be solved layer by layer and each layer is guaranteed a unique answer. EUREQA is not a knowledge game: we adopt a knowledge filtering process that ensures that most LLMs have sufficient world knowledge to answer our questions.
EUREQA comprises a total of 2,991 questions of different reasoning depths and difficulties. The entities encompass a broad spectrum of topics, effectively reducing any potential bias arising from specific entity categories. These data are great for analyzing the reasoning processes of LLMs

Image 1
Categories of entities in EUREQA
Image 2
Splits of questions in EUREQA.

Intitle Index Of Ms | Office [2021]

: Results that specifically contain the keywords for Microsoft Office software. Risks and Security Concerns

When a web server (like Apache or Nginx) does not have a default file (e.g., index.html or default.asp ), it automatically generates a directory listing page. The title of that page is almost always followed by the folder path. Thus, intitle:index of guarantees you are looking at raw directory structures, not websites.

He opened Microsoft Word. The familiar splash screen bloomed across his monitor. It didn't ask for a product key. It didn't demand a login. It just opened, presenting him with a blank, endless white canvas.

You are asking Google: "Show me all pages where the title is a raw directory listing, and those directories contain content related to Microsoft Office."

intitle index of ms office Analyses and discussion

: Results that specifically contain the keywords for Microsoft Office software. Risks and Security Concerns

When a web server (like Apache or Nginx) does not have a default file (e.g., index.html or default.asp ), it automatically generates a directory listing page. The title of that page is almost always followed by the folder path. Thus, intitle:index of guarantees you are looking at raw directory structures, not websites.

He opened Microsoft Word. The familiar splash screen bloomed across his monitor. It didn't ask for a product key. It didn't demand a login. It just opened, presenting him with a blank, endless white canvas.

You are asking Google: "Show me all pages where the title is a raw directory listing, and those directories contain content related to Microsoft Office."

Acknowledgement

This website is adapted from Nerfies, UniversalNER and LLaVA, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. We thank the LLaMA team for giving us access to their models.

Usage and License Notices: The data abd code is intended and licensed for research use only. They are also restricted to uses that follow the license agreement of LLaMA, ChatGPT, and the original dataset used in the benchmark. The dataset is CC BY NC 4.0 (allowing only non-commercial use) and models trained using the dataset should not be used outside of research purposes.